Love Wins – Rob Bell

I read Love Wins by Rob Bell a few months ago. I haven’t really written down my thoughts about it, and can’t even begin to try at the moment.

My ongoing questioning has caused some rather seismic events in my theological life. Not caused by Rob’s book really…nothing in it shocked me, having come to some of his conclusions myself. In fact I remember questioning the Gospel that was presented to me when I was 12 years old. I wondered aloud how it could be considered just that people who had never had a chance to accept Christ (because they lived and died before him) or lived now in deepest darkest Africa and died never hearing about Jesus, could be sent to eternal conscious tortuous torment in hell. A trusted person answered me (a theology student and long time minister) by saying that God would judge them according to what they had done, how they had lived, according to their conscience. It was some comfort on the surface but it didn’t take long for me to see the glaring inconsistencies: that mankind is born into sin, that it is not so much our behaviour that is the problem but our condition, that no amount of good behaviour would help. And besides….weren’t these native Africans worshipping false gods? Isn’t this really really bad? This is what my 12 year old self worried about. My gospel seemed just too small. Not quite good enough. The almost good news.

Anyway. I liked Rob Bell’s book. I don’t really understand why people get all upset about it. Do Chrisitans actually like the idea of people going to hell?

I may write more on my thoughts another day, but here’s a review that I think covers it pretty well.

Will Hell Be Empty? Rob Bell’s Love Wins – at Faith & Theology

Will hell be empty? I do not know. But it is my sincere hope that it is.




One thought on “Love Wins – Rob Bell

  1. Anonymous says:

    “I don’t really understand why people get all upset about it. Do Chrisitans actually like the idea of people going to hell?”
    I don’t think so (besides perhaps a small Reformed group). I tend to see it as a deep-seeded discomfort with the thought of there being less divine preservation of scriptural meaning than is commonly accepted. It may be only a small part of Christendom that openly identifies as King James Onlyists, but a much wider group seem to unknowingly accept different interpretations of the same premise. That’s just my take.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s